The part where China "begs" the US not to weaponize space, and then talks of how China wants to militarily dominate space... Such typical tactics to delay US progress.
*slaves do. Amazon big shots must be laughing at these people who have no choice but to accept these work conditions to make ends meet, so hard. They must talk about these people like they are garbage, peasants, when Amazon yuppies are among themselves...
That's what shocked me the most when I was doing odd jobs, the contempt, the disdain.
That's the first thing I tried to find in the paper. Far-Right = a list if political parties considered by current far-left EU governments as "Far Right".
What I have noticed is: the more criminals trespass the borders without using the big, legal gate, the more people leave the far-left.
Do you descend into repetitive, incoherent babble after a 30min, incredibly focused conversation? Does any human being without some sort of diagnosis? I assume you regularly have conversations that last more than 30 minutes (work meeting, for instance, which gpt could not participate in as an equal voice by any stretch of the imagination).
It’s an arbitrary number that felt high enough. If I said 10, people would argue that a frontier model can talk longer than that. But I have absolutely watched ChatGPT fall apart that quickly. I’m sure everyone reading this has.
We can nitpick the duration all you want, but we both know it does not take very long for this to occur. It happens particularly fast if you stray from the original topic and/or aren’t using a frontier model.
I work exclusively with OpenAI cloud models, and most high-quality agent harnesses auto-compact and does pretty well sticking to the plan of action. Papers that research the definition of AGI never include context length, and I myself don't see the logic for it either.
I don't think there will ever be universal consensus on....anything. But significant research has been published into its definition, by researchers from the main LLM providers, like https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212
Also, I would say SOTA LLM models can sustain a longer, more intelligent conversation than most people. Just in context length alone, they can keep track of more context than humans. But they're nowhere near as efficient the human brain, or the attention to quickly connect and find decades worth of memory like us.
Hah! Insurance companies proudly announce to investors how much they undercut payments.
It was precisely because of AI that I had the time and language to fight a recent claims report for a totaled vehicle, and squeezed an additional 25% from them. And it was still not adequate payout.
Let claim adjusters and insurance get off their high horse until they start being the bane of existence and paying what they owe clients.
I'd look at the Prairieland Detention Center Case to understand how broadly and aggressively this government is using "terrorism" to go after political opponents.
Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada got 30 years in prison for moving a box of magazines related to the protest. He wasn't even at the actual protest.
Several people got decades in jail because the FBI successfully convinced a jury that setting off fireworks near a detention center on the 4th of july was actually detonating bombs. And that because one idiot brought a gun and shot it, they are all guilty.
It's very much not far fetched that you as an I2P node could get hit with a terrorism charge if some political enemy ends up using your node. That's on the same level of moving pamphlets for a protest.
That's not what that Antifa terrorist did. All evidence was laid out in the court. You can read the official documents. Or you can keep reading pro-Antifa sites that whitewash what happened.
Oh. What was the charge against Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada and what exactly did he do to justify that charge and the 30 year sentence? Please link to what he did that was above and beyond what I described.
You claim it was more than just moving a box of magazines. I see no court documents or reporting saying it was anything more than that.
Transporting a box containing numerous Antifa (a designated domestic terrorist organization) materials, such as *insurrection planning*, anti-law enforcement, anti-government, and anti-immigration enforcement documents and propaganda from Sanchez Estrada’s residence to a location in Denton, Texas, *intending to conceal the box’s contents and impair its availability for use in a federal grand jury and federal criminal proceeding*.
You trying to make the contents of the magazines scary by quoting the DOJ doesn't change the nature of the crime that got him 30 years.
And, to be clear, this box could have contained a signed confession and 30 years would have still been an extremely excessive punishment. People get shorter sentences for rape, manslaughter, and maming. Heck, some murder charges are shorter than 30 years.
To the original point, the crime was moving boxes. Hosting an exit node that transports a request deemed bad by the government is exactly the same thing. After all, it may be "insurrection plans".
> Several people got decades in jail because the FBI successfully convinced a jury that setting off fireworks near a detention center on the 4th of july was actually detonating bombs. And that because one idiot brought a gun and shot it, they are all guilty.
The USG has a somewhat different description of events, and appears to have had video that they showed a jury.
> The defendants dressed in “black bloc”—dark clothing with head and face coverings that concealed their identities—designed to hide each individual’s identity but also to aid and abet those members engaged in illegal acts by making members indistinguishable from one another to law enforcement. Evidence introduced at trial revealed that the defendants brought eleven firearms, body armor, and eleven military-grade first aid kits with tourniquets and other items to treat gunshot wounds to the scene of the attack. [...] After ANTIFA Cell members arrived at the detention facility, they began shooting off and throwing fireworks (explosives) at the facility and vandalizing vehicles and a guard shack on Prairieland property. [...] Witnesses testified that an Alvarado police officer responded to the scene after correctional officers called 911. When the officer began issuing commands to defendant Nathan Baumann, Benjamin Song can be heard on police bodycam video yelling, “get to the rifles!” and then he opened fire on the officers, striking the Alvarado police officer in the neck as the unarmed correctional officers ducked and ran for cover.
Note you can see in the pictures they were definitely not just setting off fireworks "near" the detention facility, but from the camera stills its obviously intended as harassment. And "some idiot" didn't bring a gun, they were all part of a group, they brought lots of guns, and he actually shot a police officer during their "protest." Note also that the USG explicitly uses the word "fireworks", contrary to your framing.
Yeah, sorry, if you a) join a group that states it wants to overthrow the USG b) go with a bunch of members to a federal facility as part of a violent protest c) set off fireworks, vandalize everything in reach, and d) shoot a cop, you are all going to prison, and that makes perfect sense.
I'm not going to just take the word of anybody in the US government without listening to the other side. The description on "Episode 10 Who Attacked" is the other side.
Yes, because no evidence of the injury was presented at trial other than the officer's testimony.
If he was shot in the neck, why didn't the prosecution show a photo of the wound? Why are his neck and shoulder injuries a privacy concern?
What they proved is that shots were fired and that the officer involved was fine and walking around the scene after the shooting. When he said "I'm hit" another officer checked on video and said "your good your good your good".
Yes, but as someone on a high fiber diet: much less toilet paper use. The single toilet paper swipe I employ is basically for show at this point. I still do it, of course, just in case.
It depends on your digestive system and how you intake the fiber, too. There’s a very steep “learning curve” with fiber. If you intake too much too quick, you get the opposite of its benefits. Bloating, digestive distress, even pain. That’s why eating high fiber foods is said to make you go to the bathroom too much. They don’t… if you eat them consistently for a long time. Yes if you currently eat 2gs of fiber a day and then down a whole glass of cranberry juice, it will be unpleasant.
I slowly increased my fiber intake over the course of months. About +2g a day, raised every week.
Oh also, relatedly, fiber is not really a laxative. If you have issues with using the bathroom too much, fiber will help with that.
reply