Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pasc1878's commentslogin

And I prefer to live iun a place that does that.

Do you want your house blocked of by someone elses' wall. Do you want to be kept up all night by load industrial noises next to you?


Because Trump is trade warring everyone.

The middle democracies will do better fighting together and not deal with US individually.


In the UK I have seen 3 way roundabouts

In the highway code see rule 190 for two threeway roundabouts stuck together. https://highwaycode.org.uk/roundabouts/

Wikipedia shows a few e.g.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Germany,_Sachsen-Anh...

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waterloo,_Ontario,_m...


Not in UK.

However there are often pedestrian crossings across the roads or the volume is low enough pedestrians can easily cross. A local roundabout got busy enough we had crossing added less than 10 years ago and the biggest road there was a minor B road.

I am a pedestrian due to sight issues and have found very few places where it is difficult to cross when needed.


The "when needed" suggests that there are plenty of difficulty to cross intersections, you're just able to avoid them. Is that accurate?

No it just means I can't remeber any at the moment – but I am, dure some can be found.

A way to get the right to repair for the rest of the world.

Apple/MS/Google would have to keep their products working for 10 years.


It happens now – when I ask certain questions Siri asks if I want ChatGPT to answer it.

That’s gone in 27. You can still ask ChatGPT by prefixing your request with “ask ChatGPT“ like you’ve been able to for the last two years or so.

But it will never prompt you anymore, because Siri AI can handle that stuff now when it couldn’t before.

Whether you think it’s better or not is up to you. I do. I also found the version of ChatGPT it used to be worse than the one in the app.


MacOS seems to have no problem with hibernating and it and its predecessor NeXT have been using swap files for over 30 years.

MacOS has no problem with hibernation because hardware and software are designed together: it uses TPM to manage swap encryption. I assume "BIOS" is also optimized to enable fast boot on sleep.

Linux can work with TPM but it's never as smooth. (Unless I guess you make it custom for your specific setup.)


These days with cryptenroll and friends, using the TPM is hardly an issue anymore. LVM and swapfiles both work well if you just create one large "everything but EFI" encrypted volume.

You'd need to keep secure boot on, preferably with your own keys loaded, to get all of the benefits, and that's a bit harder to automate.

Windows does all of this and more. It's harder on Linux because of a lack of tooling/interest/business incentives, and because on average Linux users want more control over their hardware than Windows users.


Windows has no problem with hibernation and FDE and it uses a swap file.

Windows and Linux run on the exact same hardware. Windows hibernation doesn't rely on secret bios features.

Unreliable hibernation is 100% and undeniably a Linux problem, there is no secret advantage or conspiracy to keep it down. It's just that nobody cares enough to make Linux not suck.


I have FDE with keys in the TPM. It's pretty smooth bit required a one time additional step in Fedora. It's also probably not very secure, but my threat model is simple theft.

What's the benefit of using the TPM compared to a simple passphrase at boot, in that scenario?

Sorry for the late answer: the benefit is that I don't have to enter my passphrase at boot.

A person wouldn't be able to pull the disk to get at the information

Assuming that the person pulling the disk doesn't have the passphrase, what's the difference?

Assuming things are configured correctly, the TPM would only provide the key to unlock the drive if the correct OS has been booted. Attempting to boot from a live usb to have a look at the data wouldn't work, since the TPM wouldn't present the key required.

You can see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Trusted_Platform_Module#PCR... for an example of doing so


I read but on my phone or ebook reader and have done so for nearly 20 years. Especially since mass market paperbacks were replaced by larger ones that do not fit in my pocket or bookshelves.

I am in England – It is considered very odd to talk to strangers on a train or bus


I would say it's pretty common to talk to strangers on the train in England. I could just be the "Northerner terrifying Londoners by saying Hello" though. I do know not to start a conversation with a stranger on the tube.

I think it depends on the train journey personally. I'd never dream of striking up a conversation on the Tube or a busy commuter line; personally I'm the definition of 'not a morning person' so I've no social battery to spare in those circumstances. On the other hand I quite like a chat when I'm not in a hurry or it's not the morning, makes the time go faster.

Mind you most of the talk seems to be along the lines of 'GWR couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery' these days.


No that does not work the ones who benefited just sell the shares before the fines are imposed and the ones who buy would be the ones you punish then.


the value of the shares would drop anyway for the first group.


They would sell before the shares started dropping

See who owns Thames Water now and compare with who held it 15-20 years ago


It is. The American version just does not say what it means.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: