So what do you think the rational response to the nukebullies should be? Give him all he wants? How are reasonable deterrence preparations "Bravado"?

Can you explain what you meant with this sentence on that page you wrote:

"That is the whole system, not a stripped-down mode you switch into."

Nothing, because that was written by an LLM.

This is the Claude-ism that I despise the most, when it states something that was never asked because it leaked from the prompt/context. Claude's writing has regressed so much, it's only usable for "raw coding" now.

Did I miss something or does this article not bother to indicate how much RAM their M4-Max had?

Footnote on page 3.

>Total parameter count governs storage: at FP4, MIXTRAL-8X7B fits within 24 GB GDDR6 (Quadro RTX 6000), and GPT-OSS-120B fits within 128 GB unified memory (Apple M4 Max).

yeah my 'promptly AI' alarm clock almost always spends 7 days, as soon as the binary changes, even descriptions changes take several days

They didn't actually steal in the sense that the information is still there on the internet.... About these shredded rare books, now we're talking.

If I may propose instead of "steal" I think we could agree to write they "Aaron-Swartz'ed" the information from the internet, what do you think, is this too harsh on Sam Altman or Carmen Ortiz ?

Is anything too harsh for these new robber barons?

I have seen plenty of Qwen 3.8 27B's caveman-like "Need doing this & that" thoughts. And on cerebras now I've seen them come real fast!

Do you prompt it to behave this way or what?

Because here's the king of CoT I get:

> Hmm, but there's a subtlety: does babel-jest + preset-typescript transform the file to CJS by default? No — babel-jest doesn't transform ESM imports to CJS unless @babel/preset-env is configured with modules: commonjs. Without preset-env, import statements stay as ESM in the output, and Jest's CJS runtime would fail with "Cannot use import statement outside a module" unless the project is ESM and running with --experimental-vm-modules.

> Hmm wait, actually babel-preset-jest... does it include preset-env? Let me recall: babel-preset-jest = { plugins: [require('babel-plugin-jest-hoist')] } plus istanbul for coverage. No preset-env. So ESM imports stay as-is.

> But wait — if the user's project is ESM (which it probably is, given the .ts extension imports — Node's type stripping requires ESM-style? no, type stripping also works for CJS-style .ts files with require... actually, --experimental-strip-types supports both CJS and ESM .ts files. But explicit .ts extensions in imports only work in ESM mode (CJS require doesn't allow extensions... actually, does Node 22+ allow require of .ts with flag?

Lots of “but wait” and and full sentences, nothing caveman-like or extremely short sentences without verbs like the GPT thinking trace above.

(this is with unsloth's Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q5_K_XL.gguf with T° = 0.8)

I was on unquantized 27B, and also Q8 K XL, same "Need do..." paragraphs. We landed in near but distinct morrasses I guess.

Glucocorticoids in your early amygdala? That's a bummer!

Blame the game, not the player! In today's kind spirit of early-internet you're also not a dog on the internet communities, there you go...

No warranty granted or implied: A bit of sarcosine in the morning, and a bit more glycine at night I say. :-)

Repeating myself here but anyone who has not yet watched the whole 2024 series of Prof. Sapolsky "Human Behavioural Biology" lectures series... really should.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZI2GQlNdJA

RIP Lee Holloway

> RIP Lee Holloway

Did I miss something about Lee Holloway?

"The gap became the north star" is written large enough though: I could read it with my own Aieyes!

It's also the only sentence I read on that page before closing it, of course.

I wouldn't call this a bias. More likely an A/B tested find that (1) algorithmic YouTube video-surfacing with keyword "graph" plus AI related name-dropping was effective, and (2) the already well established journalistic trick of leading with fear to trigger loss-aversion, as "prompting is soon dead" implies some threat of skills-value loss for the reader.

driving engagement to scrape the bottom of our ad-driven engagement dis-attention economy, tragedy of the commons pure.

Right. That, and what I wrote simultaneously nearby.

Maybe the common point is "bad incentives".

The one weird trick of reassigning all the income from that contents-stealing to the original posters would I think cover a lot of the realignment.