I noticed my YouTube recommended searches seeming to change based on what Claude has just recommended me the other day. I do wonder how much of this data is being shared between the companies.

I this is part of a larger issue of our economics rewarding immediate results, but not good process.

Basically, as long as this is the mechanism by which people earn money to stay alive, the world will always be optimized towards results.

For me the tell for AI-generated-anything is too much detail

Like, it just throws everything in there, because it doesn't have the same friction that humans do.

Blocked the a few attempts I tried, usually by changing the amount of fencing:

- Let the player jump over walls

- Let the player teleport the flag to them

- Make the world 3D

Interesting, I shall have to try this on other software!

Yeah I was skeptical about AI until I learned (through hands on testing) that an AI can fail 9 times and get it right on the 10th time - in like 1/10th of the time it takes a human to get it right. It's all in the iteration.

Turns out geopolitical coordination around AI already exists. It's just not American

Related: I've started getting my agents to create and use a KANBAN.md as a source of truth for software projects. It's turning out excellent for agent handover, and tracking design decisions all in a single place.

> They have shown time and time again that they are not to be trusted, yet, the main ask is to trust us, only us.

Exactly. For everyone outside the US, we see a tech industry that has spent 25 years moving fast and breaking things AND elevated Trump to be POTUS - which has destabilized the rest of the world. This is after 70 years of the US invading and destroying small countries, often without plans or robust reason, all in the name of "democracy" (ask any other country if they feel like they had a vote in the US's actions)

Why the hell would we put our trust in a few AI Labs in the US, when this is the legacy they will be reinforcing? It has to be Open models - for the people. No more of this US-paternalistic bullshit.

If by “we” you mean “experts and professionals outside the US”, I think the short answer is they’re not talking to you here. They’re trying to secure regulatory capture in the US, and monopolize their hold on US corporations. To the extent they’re thinking of other “markets”, I would guess the assume the outsized influence of US corporations will have the much of the rest of the world using their products.

> I believe he truly has humanity's best interests at heart

How can you possibly believe this? What else would someone in his position say? No billionaire has humanity's interest at heart, so they try to hide that fact by building libraries (Carnegie) or creating foundations named after themselves.

All of his words and none of his actions support his caring at all about humanity, and you choose to believe his words? The man has an IPO coming up (probably one of the biggest ever!), he could not be in a less trustworthy position.

I was involved in this research a few years ago: https://metamiditoolkit.com/research-paper/

One of the things that struck me was that most people have an area of their workflow that they would be happy to hand off to an AI, so that they can focus on the thing they love. However, that area is different for each person. One person's grind-work is another person's love-work.

This is why it's so hard to build consensus around where the "red lines" are in this space.

Funny, I'm now finding my first thought with new hardware like this to be "how good is it at running AI models locally?"