Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I know this is probably in jest, but I think Hanlon's razor applies here

> "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence."



Widespread belief in Hanlon's razor is very useful to anybody looking to get away with something.


Hanlon's razor is forever at odds with plausible deniability.


There is of course a middle point here... "oh, I don't like this guy and he's incompetent enough so that I can be a little evil to him without risking any consecuence".


Incompetence apparently pays pretty well


I'm guessing the risk was asymetric for SoftBank vs KSA. SoftBank probably made a ton of money guaranteed by the deals, plus the chance to make a ton more if they worked out.

KSA only makes money if it works out, and it's not.

KSA loses, SoftBank still won.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: